Logo

CONDUCTING RESEARCH IN MEDICINE

Authors

  • Asatullayev Rustamjon Baxtiyarovich

    Scientific supervisor
    Author
  • Olimjonov Sardor Mashrab o‘g‘li

    Student
    Author

Keywords:

Medical research, healthcare innovation, funding challenges, regulatory barriers, ethical considerations, research reproducibility, personalized medicine, regenerative therapies, digital health, global collaboration, open science.

Abstract

Medical research is fundamental to healthcare innovation, driving advancements in diagnostics, treatments, and patient care. However, it faces significant challenges, including funding shortages, regulatory barriers, ethical dilemmas, and concerns over research reproducibility. Transparency in funding sources and conflicts of interest is crucial for maintaining credibility and public trust. Ethical considerations, particularly in clinical trials involving vulnerable populations, remain a pressing issue. Despite these challenges, technological advancements such as personalized medicine, regenerative therapies, and digital health solutions offer promising opportunities. International collaboration and open science initiatives play a vital role in accelerating discoveries and improving global health outcomes. Addressing existing barriers through scientific rigor, ethical responsibility, and sustainable funding will ensure continued progress in medical research.

References

1. National Institutes of Health (NIH). (2023). Funding and grant opportunities in medical research. Retrieved from https://www.nih.gov

2. World Health Organization (WHO). (2022). Ethical considerations in medical research. Retrieved from https://www.who.int

3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2023). Drug approval process and regulatory framework. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov

4. European Medicines Agency (EMA). (2022). Regulation and oversight in medical research. Retrieved from https://www.ema.europa.eu

5. Collins, F. S., & Varmus, H. (2015). A new initiative on precision medicine. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372(9), 793-795. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1500523

6. Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

7. Nature Editorial. (2016). Reproducibility: A tragedy of errors. Nature, 530(7588), 141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/530141a

8. Kemp, E., Floyd, D., McCord, S., & Morrison, A. (2021). The impact of digital health technologies on medical research and patient care. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(4), e23456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/23456

9. National Academy of Sciences. (2018). Open science by design: Realizing a transparent and accessible future for research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/25116

10. The Lancet. (2020). Global collaboration in pandemic research: Lessons from COVID-19. The Lancet Global Health, 8(7), e863-e868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30208-5

Downloads

Published

2025-03-03