OZBEKISTONDA CHET TILLARINI O‘QITISHDA MOTIVATSYA-METOD MAMAMASI VA AHAMIYATI
Keywords:
O‘zbekistonda chet tilini o‘qitish, o‘qitish usullari, motivatsiya,Abstract
oxirgi yillarda dunyo xalqlari va jamiyatlar o‘rtasidagi yaqinlashuv muqarrar bo‘lib, bu holatga parallel ravishda chet tillarini o‘rgatishning ahamiyati yanada ortdi. Dunyoda vaziyat shunday bo‘lsa-da, O‘zbekistonda chet tilini o‘qitishdan olingan salbiy natijalar dolzarb muhokama mavzusidir. O‘zbekistonda qo‘llaniladigan noto‘g‘ri usullar va yosh avlodni motivatsiya qilmaslik jamiyatda chet tilini o‘qitishga nisbatan jiddiy noto‘g‘ri qarashlarni keltirib chiqardi. O‘zbekistonda chet tilini o‘qitishda muhim muammo sifatida ko‘rilgan motivatsiya-uslubiy muammolar va echimlar ushbu maqolada ko‘rib chiqiladi. Olingan natijalar asosida O‘zbekistonda chet tilini o‘qitishda muammolarni tashkil etuvchi sabablar motivatsiya va metodga asoslangan muammolar sifatida o‘rganildi va ular uchun yechim takliflari ishlab chiqildi.
References
1. AKSAN, Doğan (1987) Her Yönüyle Dil Ana Çizgileriyle Dilbilim. Ankara: TDK Yayınları.
2. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Blanche, P., & Merino, B. J. (1989). Self-assessment of foreign-language skills: Implications for teachers and researchers. Language Learning, 39(3), 313–340.
6. Mustafa ARSLAN & Azamat AKBAROV Selçuk Üniversitesi/Seljuk University Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi/Journal of Faculty of Letters Yıl/ Year: 2010, Sayı/Number: 24, Sayfa/Page: 179–191
7. ERGİN, M. (1997), Üniversiteler İçin Türk Dili, İstanbul: Bayrak basım/yayım/tanıtım. İLTER, B., Er, S. (2007),
8. EKMEKÇİ, F. Ö. (1983a), “Yabancı Dil Eğitimi Kavram ve Kapsamı”, Türk Dili Dil Öğretimi Özel Sayısı, C: XLVII, 113
9. EKMEKÇİ, F. Ö. (1983b), “Yabancı Dil Eğitimi Kavram ve Kapsamı”, Türk Dili Dil Öğretimi Özel Sayısı, C: XLVII, 111
10. CORDER, Pit (1965) The Language Laboratory. (Editör: Harold Allen), Teaching English as a Second Language. Phillippens: Mcgraw-Hill Book Company, 342-346.
11. Oller, J. W. (1997). Monoglottosis: What’s wrong with the idea of the IQ meritocracy and its racy cousins? Applied Linguistics, 18(4), 467–507.
12. Padilla, A. M., Sung, H., & Aninao, J. (1997). Less-commonly taught languages in selected elementary and secondary schools in California. Foreign Language Assistance Act Program Evaluation Project. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
13. HEATHERINGTON, Madelon (1980) How Language Works. USA: Winthrop Publish Inc.
14. Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 2–27). London: Longman.
15. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1–47.
16. Cummins, J. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49, 222–251.
17. Cummins, J. (1992). Language proficiency, bilingualism, and academic achievement. In P. A. Richard-Amato & M. A. Snow (Eds.), The multicultural classroom (pp. 16– 26). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
18. Cummins, J. (2001). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
19. Yuko Goto Butler What Level of English Proficiency Do Elementary School Teachers Need to Attain to Teach EFL? Case Studies from Korea, Taiwan, and Japan TESOL QUARTERLY Vol. 38, No. 2, Summer 2004. Pp 245-278.