PROCEDURE FOR DETERMINING DOMESTIC SYSTEMICALLY IMPORTANT BANKS
Keywords:
Indicators for determining domestic systemically important banks, Basel Committee, Central Bank of the Republic of Uzbekistan.Abstract
The article studies the procedure for identifying domestic systemically important banks. In particular, the opinions and scientific research of economists on this issue are studied. At the same time, The main emphasis is on the methodology for identifying systemically important banks. In particular, analytical data from the USA, Germany, Great Britain, Japan and others were studied.
References
1. Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. ZRQ-582 “On the Central Bank of the Republic of Uzbekistan” dated November 11, 2019.
2. Approved by Resolution No. 4/13 of the Board of the Central Bank of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated February 18, 2023.
3. BCBS. (2012, October). A framework for dealing with domestic systemically important banks.
4. O‘zbekiston Respublikasining 2019-yil 5-noyabrdagi “Banklar va bank faoliyati to‘g‘risida”gi O‘RQ-580–sonli Qonuni.
1. A framework for dealing with domestic systemically important banks. URL: https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs233.pdf
2. A framework for dealing with domestic systemically important banks. Principle 5. Pp. 3,
3. Larozyer J. de. Regulirovaniye protiv nadzora // Central-Banking. com, February 21, 2012. URL: http://www.centralbanking.com/type/interview/ category/central-banks/monetary-policy
5. Demirguc-Kunt A. Do we need big banks? Evidence on performance, strategy and market discipline. The World Bank Development Research Group Finance and Private Sector Development Team, 2011.
6. Zhou C. Are Banks Too Big to Fail? Measuring Systemic Importance of Financial Institutions. International Journal of Central Banking, 2010
7. Global systemically important banks: assessment methodology and the additional loss absorbency requirement. URL:https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs207.pdf
8. Podxodы k opredeleniyu natsionalno sistemno znachimыx bankov izlojenы v dokumente Deutsche Bundesbank, The German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority «Main features of the method for the identification of other systemically important institutions (O-SII)», 08.05.2017. URL:https://www.bundesbank.de/resource/blob/625806.pdf
9. Statement of Policy “The PRA”s approach to identifying other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs)» (fevral 2016). URL: https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/–/media/boe/files/prudential-regulation/policy-statement/2016
10. Po otchetnыm dannыm na 31-dekabrya 2017 goda. URL: https://www.bankofengland.co.uk
11. Hong Kong Monetary Authority Supervisory Policy Manual Systemically Important Banks. CA-B-2. V1–18.02.2015. URL:https://www.hkma.gov.hk/media/eng/doc/key-functions/banking-stability/supervisory-policy-manual/CA-B-2.pdf
12. Regulatory Consistency Assessment Programme (RCAP) Assessment of Basel III G-SIB framework and review of D-SIB frameworks – Japan (iyun 2016). URL: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d371.pdf
13. Regulatory Consistency Assessment Programme (RCAP) – Assessment of Basel III LCR regulations – Japan (dekabr 2016). URL: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d391.pdf