Logo

DIGITAL DIVIDE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING: URBAN VS RURAL STUDENTS IN UZBEKISTAN

Authors

  • Khudoyorova Gulasal Ilhomiddinovna

    Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages, 2nd year student, 24-03-group.
    Author

Keywords:

Digital Divide, English Language Learning, Urban Students, Rural Students, EFL, Educational Technology, Digital Literacy

Abstract

The rapid advancement of digital technologies has transformed education, including English language learning (ELL). However, unequal access to digital resources creates a digital divide that affects students’ learning outcomes, particularly in countries with diverse geographic and infrastructural conditions such as Uzbekistan. This study examines the differences in English proficiency between urban and rural students, focusing on how access to digital tools, internet connectivity, and technological devices influences learning. A mixed-method approach was employed, including surveys, interviews, and English proficiency tests, with participants from both urban and rural educational institutions. Findings indicate that urban students consistently outperform rural students in English skills, largely due to better access to online resources, interactive platforms, and AI-assisted learning tools. However, rural students demonstrate high motivation and adaptability when provided with supportive digital interventions. The study highlights the need for targeted policies to bridge the digital divide, ensuring equitable access to technology and promoting effective English language learning for all students

References

1. Godwin-Jones, R. (2018). Emerging Technologies: AI and Language Learning. Language Learning & Technology, 22(3), 1–17.

2. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2012). Mobile Language Learning Now and in the Future. The International Research Foundation for English Language Education, 10(3), 1–20.

3. Li, Y., & Ni, H. (2021). Digital Tools and English Language Learning in Higher Education: Urban vs Rural Students. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(4), 500–520.

4. Ministry of Public Education, Uzbekistan. (2022). Digital Education Strategy and Policy Guidelines. Tashkent: Government Publication.

5. OECD. (2019). Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection. Paris: OECD Publishing.

6. Rehm, M., & Notten, A. (2020). Digital Inequality in Language Learning: Challenges and Opportunities. Computers & Education, 156, 103952.

7. UNESCO. (2020). Education in a Post-COVID World: Nine Ideas for Public Action. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

8. Van Dijk, J. (2020). The Digital Divide. 2nd Edition. London: Polity Press.

9. Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

10. Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New Technology and Digital Worlds: Analyzing Evidence of Equity in Access, Use, and Outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34, 179–225.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-18