Logo

THE ROLE OF FEEDBACK IN DEVELOPPING ACADEMIC WRITING SKILLS IN EFL LEARNERS

Authors

  • Rzambetova Malika Marat qızı

    Republic of Karakalpakstan, Nukus city 2nd-year student of the Faculty of Foreign Languages at Karakalpak State University Philology and Teaching Languages (English Language)
    Author

Keywords:

feedback, academic writing, EFL learners, peer review, teacher feedback, writing development, language learning, error correction

Abstract

The development of academic writing skills remains one of the most challenging aspects of learning English as a Foreign Language (EFL). Among the various pedagogical tools available, feedback plays a central role in shaping learners’ writing competence, accuracy, and confidence. This article explores the multifaceted role of feedback in enhancing academic writing skills among EFL learners, examining its types, effectiveness, and impact on learner autonomy and performance. Drawing on contemporary research and classroom practices, the study highlights how constructive, timely, and targeted feedback contributes to improved grammatical accuracy, coherence, cohesion, and critical thinking. The article also addresses challenges associated with feedback implementation, including learner dependency and misinterpretation, and suggests strategies for optimizing its effectiveness in diverse educational contexts.

References

1. Dana R. Ferris (2003). Response to Student Writing: Implications for Second Language Students. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

2. John Bitchener, & Ute Knoch (2010). The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development: A Ten-Month Investigation.

3. John Truscott (1996). The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes.

4. Ken Hyland, & Fiona Hyland (2006). Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

5. Ilona Leki (1991). The Preferences of ESL Students for Error Correction in College-Level Writing Classes.

6. Robert B. Kaplan (1966). Cultural Thought Patterns in Intercultural Education. Language Learning, 16(1–2), 1–20. (pp. 10–15)

7. Lee, Icy (2008). Understanding Teachers’ Written Feedback Practices in Hong Kong Secondary Classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 69–85.

8. Paul Kei Matsuda (2003). Process and Post-Process: A Discursive History. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 65–83. (pp. 70–75)

9. David R. Russell (1990). Writing Across the Curriculum in Historical Perspective. College English, 52(1), 52–73. (pp. 60–65)

10. Alister Cumming (2001). ESL/EFL Instructors’ Practices for Writing Assessment: Specific Purposes or General Purposes? Language Testing, 18(2), 207–224. (pp. 210–215)

Downloads

Published

2026-05-01