Logo

ADDRESSING THE NEEDS OF RURAL WORKING CLASS FAMILIES THROUGH GRADE 9 ENGLISH LANGUAGE POLICY IN UZBEKISTAN

Authors

  • Zumrad Khodjieva

    Teacher at Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages zumi44444@gmail.com
    Author
  • Nigora Saidmuradova

    Senior Lecture at Bath Spa University (London Campus) nigora.saidmuradova@westminister.ac.uk
    Author

Keywords:

language policy, rural education, Grade 9 English, Uzbekistan, working class families.

Abstract

Language education policy plays a critical role in ensuring equitable access to quality learning opportunities for all students. In Uzbekistan, where approximately 50% of the population resides in rural areas (Department of Statistics of Uzbekistan, 2018), English language education must respond to the socio economic realities of working class families. This article analyzes the Grade 9 English workbook used in general secondary schools in Uzbekistan and evaluates its alignment with the needs of rural learners. Drawing on language policy and planning theory, communicative language teaching, and socio educational perspectives, the study offers policy relevant recommendations for curriculum designers, policymakers, and educational stakeholders. The article argues that while the workbook reflects modern communicative and competency based approaches, structural inequalities, resource limitations, and contextual mismatches continue to challenge rural implementation. Addressing these gaps is essential for inclusive language policy reform..

References

1. British Council. (2019). PRESETT: Pre service teacher education reform in Uzbekistan. https://www.britishcouncil.uz

2. Ministry of Public Education of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2017). State educational standards for foreign languages. Tashkent.

3. Presidential Decree No. PQ 1875. (2012). On measures to further improve the system of learning foreign languages. Government of the Republic of Uzbekistan.

4. Presidential Decree No. UP 5712. (2019). On the concept for the development of the public education system until 2030. Government of the Republic of Uzbekistan.

5. Department of Statistics of Uzbekistan. (2018). Demographic indicators of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Tashkent.

6. Khodjieva Z., Ardiana A., Rum E., Syatriana E. From Feedback to Artificial Intelligence: A Bibliometric Mapping Analysis of the Thematic Evolution of EFL Writing Assessment Research Trends (2014–2024) // International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. Volume: 24, No. 9, pp. 893-921. https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijter/article/view/14249

7. Khodjieva Zumrad Makhmudjonovna. (2022). QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CRITERIA-BASED ASSESSMENT OF UNIVERSITY TEACHERS. FAN, TA’LIM, MADANIYAT VA INNOVATSIYA JURNALI | JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, EDUCATION, CULTURE AND INNOVATION, 1(3), 52–55. Retrieved from http://mudarrisziyo.uz/index.php/innovatsiya/article/view/89

8. Makhmudjonovna, K. Z. (2022). DIFFICULTIES IN CRITERIA-BASED ASSESSMENT. IJTIMOIY FANLARDA INNOVATSIYA ONLAYN ILMIY JURNALI, 2(6), 28–31. Retrieved from https://www.sciencebox.uz/index.php/jis/article/view/2985

9. OECD. (2012). Equity and quality in education: Supporting disadvantaged students and schools. OECD Publishing.

10. Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge University Press.

11. Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge University Press.

12. Tollefson, J. W. (2013). Language policy in a time of crisis and transformation. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education (pp. 3–16). Routledge.

13. Zumrad Khodjieva. (2021). LANGUAGE PLANNING AND POLICY PROPOSAL, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES. Emergent: Journal of Educational Discoveries and Lifelong Learning (EJEDL), 2(05), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4TDYB

Downloads

Published

2026-06-28