DOMESTICATION AND FOREIGNIZATION IN THE MACHINE TRANSLATION OF UZBEK PROVERBS AND IDIOMS
Abstract
References
] Baker M. (2018). In other words: A coursebook on translation (3rd ed.). Routledge.
[2] Dankers V., Lucas C., Titov I. (2022). Can Transformer be too compositional? Analysing idiom processing in neural machine translation. Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 3608–3626.
[3] Jones R., Irvine A. (2013). The (un)faithful machine translator. Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, and Humanities, 96–101.
[4] Joshi P., Santy S., Budhiraja A., Bali K., Choudhury M. (2020). The state and fate of linguistic diversity and inclusion in the NLP world. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 6282–6293.
[5] Musayev Q. (2005). Tarjima nazariyasi asoslari [Fundamentals of translation theory]. Tashkent: Fan.
[6] Qodiriy A. (2018). Bygone days (M. Reese, Trans.). Muloqot Cultural Engagement Program. (Original work published 1926)
[7] Salomov G. (1983). Tarjima nazariyasi asoslari [Fundamentals of translation theory]. Tashkent: O'qituvchi.
[8] Schleiermacher F. (2012). On the different methods of translating (S. Bernofsky, Trans.). In Venuti L. (Ed.), The translation studies reader (3rd ed., pp. 43–63). Routledge. (Original work published 1813)
[9] Veitsman Y., Hartmann M. (2025). Recent advancements and challenges of Turkic Central Asian language processing. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Language Models for Low-Resource Languages, 309–324.
[10] Venuti L. (1995). The translator's invisibility: A history of translation. Routledge.
