Logo

AKADEMIK FAOLLIK ORQALI OLIY TA’LIMTALABALARINING YOZISH KO‘NIKMALARINI RIVOJLANTIRISH

Authors

  • Xayrullayeva Fotima Bo‘ston qizi

    Buxoro davlat pedagogika instituti
    Author

Keywords:

akademik faollik, akademik yozuv, yozish kompetensiyasi, oliy ta’lim, peer-review, refleksiya, fikr-mulohaza, raqamli ta’lim, argumentatsiya, mustaqil ta’lim

Abstract

Mazkur maqolada oliy ta’lim talabalari yozish ko‘nikmalarini akademik faollik asosida rivojlantirishning pedagogik imkoniyatlari tahlil qilinadi. Akademik faollik tushunchasi mustaqil yozish, manbalarni tahlil qilish, kichik guruhdagi munozara, peer-review, refleksiya, loyiha va raqamli yozuv topshiriqlarining o‘zaro bog‘langan tizimi sifatida talqin etiladi. Maqolada yozish kompetensiyasi mazmun, mantiqiy tuzilma, dalillash, manbalarni integratsiya qilish, akademik til va tahrirlash kabi mezonlar orqali modellashtiriladi. Empirik tadqiqot uchun taklif etilayotgan metodik model pre-test/post-test, rubrika asosidagi baholash, talabalar refleksiyasi va o‘qituvchi kuzatuvini birlashtiradi. Ilmiy adabiyotlar akademik yozuvni rivojlantirishda faol ishtirok, hamkorlikdagi yozuv va konstruktiv fikr-mulohaza muhimligini ko‘rsatadi; xususan, peer-feedback bo‘yicha 2014–2024-yillar tadqiqotlarini qamrab olgan sistematik sharh 60 ta maqolani tahlil qilgan. 

References

. Cumming, A., Lai, C., & Cho, H. (2016). Students' writing from sources for academic purposes: A synthesis of recent research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 47–58. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2016.06.002.

2. Liu, X. et al. (2024). Incorporating peer feedback in academic writing: a systematic review of benefits and challenges. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1506725.

3. Li, J., & Mak, L. (2022). The effects of using an online collaboration tool on college students’ learning of academic writing skills. System, 105, 102712. DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2021.102712.

4. Tuononen, T., Hyytinen, H., Kleemola, K., Hailikari, T., Männikkö, I., & Toom, A. (2022). Systematic Review of Learning Generic Skills in Higher Education—Enhancing and Impeding Factors. Frontiers in Education, 7, 885917.

5. O'Flaherty, J., & Costabile, M. (2020/2021). Using a science simulation-based learning tool to develop students’ active learning, self-confidence and critical thinking in academic writing.

6. Begmatova, K., & Saydazimova, I. (2026). Enhancing learners’ academic writing skills: a comparative analysis of traditional and AI-assisted instruction approaches. Applied Corpus Linguistics, 6(1), 100176. DOI: 10.1016/j.acorp.2025.100176.

7. Lu, Q., Zhu, X., Zhu, S., & Yao, Y. (2024). Effects of writing feedback literacies on feedback engagement and writing performance: A cross-linguistic perspective. Assessing Writing, 62, 100889.

8. Zhao, H., Dang, T. N. Y., & Finlayson, N. (2025). Education lecturers’ expectations about writing proficiency: Insights from corpus analysis of teacher feedback on academic writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 67, 101173.

9. Mahmud, M. M., Teh, J. K. L., & Azizan, S. N. (2026). Hyflex learning and student engagement in higher education: a systematic literature review. Frontiers in Education, 11, 1773704.

10. Robles Mucho, J. L. et al. (2026). Open learner models and pedagogical strategies in higher education: a meta-synthesis of approaches to self-regulated learning. Frontiers in Education.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-10