CLASSIFICATION OF SENTENCES IN MODERN RUSSIAN LANGUAGE
Keywords:
The aim of this research is to develop a comprehensive classification system for sentences in modern Russian that addresses the inconsistencies and gaps in existing linguistic frameworks; the key issue is determining the syntactic and semantic features that differentiate sentence structures, for which quantitative and qualitative data from contemporary Russian texts, including literary works, newspapers, and digital communications, will be analyzed.Abstract
This dissertation investigates the classification of sentences in the modern Russian language, aiming to establish a systematic framework that rectifies the inconsistencies and gaps observed in current linguistic models. The research centers on identifying the syntactic and semantic features that delineate various sentence structures, employing a robust analysis of both quantitative and qualitative data derived from contemporary Russian texts, including literary sources, journalistic articles, and digital communications. The findings reveal distinct patterns in sentence formation and usage, highlighting previously unrecognized relationships between syntactic constructions and coherent meaning-making processes. Significantly, these insights extend beyond theoretical linguistics, offering implications for the field of healthcare by enhancing the clarity and effectiveness of communication in medical contexts, where precise language can have profound impacts on patient understanding and treatment outcomes. Ultimately, this study contributes to a deeper comprehension of language structure, thereby facilitating more effective dialogue in healthcare settings and informing future research on linguistic applications in professional communication disciplines. By addressing foundational challenges in sentence classification, this research paves the way for improved interpretative frameworks that can be applied across various domains, rendering it a valuable resource for linguists, healthcare professionals, and educators alike.
References
1. John Lawrence, Chris Reed (2019) Argument Mining: A Survey. Volume(45), 765-818. Computational Linguistics. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00364
2. Ferdinand de Saussure (2017) Course in General Linguistics. . Macat Library eBooks. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781912281732
3. Dong Nguyen, A. Seza Doğruöz, Carolyn Penstein Rosé, Franciska de Jong (2016) Computational Sociolinguistics: A Survey. Volume(42), 537-593. Computational Linguistics. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00258
4. Jane Klavan, Dagmar Divjak (2016) The cognitive plausibility of statistical classification models: Comparing textual and behavioral evidence. Volume(50). Folia Linguistica. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2016-0014
5. Johan van der Auwera, Alfonso Zamorano Aguilar (2015) The History of Modality and Mood. . Oxford University Press eBooks. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.4
6. Sebastian Ruder, Ivan Vulić, Anders Søgaard (2019) A Survey of Cross-lingual Word Embedding Models. Volume(65), 569-631. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. doi: https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.11640
7. Yonatan Belinkov, James Glass (2019) Analysis Methods in Neural Language Processing: A Survey. Volume(7), 49-72. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00254
8. Claire Gardent, Anastasia Shimorina, Shashi Narayan, Laura Perez-Beltrachini (2017) The WebNLG Challenge: Generating Text from RDF Data. doi: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w17-3518
9. Geert Booij (2016) Construction Morphology. Cambridge University Press eBooks. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139814720.016
10. Tao Chen, Ruifeng Xu, Yulan He, Xuan Wang (2016) Improving sentiment analysis via sentence type classification using BiLSTM-CRF and CNN. Volume(72), 221-230. Expert Systems with Applications. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.10.065
11. Melissa L. Rethlefsen, Shona Kirtley, Siw Waffenschmidt, Ana Patricia Ayala, David Moher, Matthew J. Page, Jonathan Koffel, et al. (2021) PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews. Volume(10). Systematic Reviews. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z
12. Stéphane Couture, Sophie Toupin (2019) What does the notion of “sovereignty” mean when referring to the digital?. Volume(21), 2305-2322. New Media & Society. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819865984
13. Karen M. Douglas, Joseph E. Uscinski, Robbie M. Sutton, Aleksandra Cichocka, Türkay Salim Nefes, Chee Siang Ang, Farzin Deravi (2019) Understanding Conspiracy Theories. Volume(40), 3-35. Political Psychology. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12568
14. Sebastian Stier, Arnim Bleier, Haiko Lietz, Markus Strohmaier (2018) Election Campaigning on Social Media: Politicians, Audiences, and the Mediation of Political Communication on Facebook and Twitter. Volume(35), 50-74. Political Communication. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1334728
15. Jacob Edmond (2016) No Discipline: An Introduction to “The Indiscipline of Comparison”. Volume(53), 647-659. Comparative Literature Studies. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/complitstudies.53.4.0647
16. Bailyn, John Frederick (2013) The syntax of slavic predicate case. doi: https://core.ac.uk/download/19210215.pdf
17. Ahrenberg, Lars, Tiedemann, Jörg, Volk, Martin (2010) Proceedings. doi: https://core.ac.uk/download/14484263.pdf
18. Kravchenko, Prof. A.V., Zelberg, Dr. J.B. (2005) Complex sentence as a structure for representing knowledge. doi: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/86132.pdf
19. Arsenijević, Boban, Burukina, Irina, Dočekal, Mojmír, Dziubała-Szrejbrowska, et al. (2019) Advances in formal Slavic linguistics 2017. doi: https://core.ac.uk/download/276541475.pdf
20. Arsenijević, Boban, Burukina, Irina, Dočekal, Mojmír, Dziubała-Szrejbrowska, et al. (2019) Advances in formal Slavic linguistics 2017. doi: https://core.ac.uk/download/276541595.pdf