l

THE ROLE OF SCAFFOLDING IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION.

Authors

  • Yusupova Dildora To’xtamurod qizi

    Asia International University, intern-techer
    Author

Keywords:

Scaffolding, Second Language Acquisition (SLA), Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), Language Learning Strategies, Guided Practice, Interactive Feedback, Communicative Competence, Linguistic Development, Language Pedagogy, Classroom Instruction

Abstract

Scaffolding is a crucial instructional strategy in second language acquisition (SLA), providing structured support that enables learners to progress toward greater linguistic competence. This article examines the theoretical foundations of scaffolding, drawing on Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) and its application in language learning. It explores various scaffolding techniques, such as modeling, guided practice, and interactive feedback, highlighting their effectiveness in different classroom settings. Additionally, the article reviews empirical studies that demonstrate the impact of scaffolding on vocabulary acquisition, grammar development, and communicative competence. The discussion also addresses challenges teachers face in implementing scaffolding, particularly in multilingual and diverse classrooms. The findings suggest that effective scaffolding not only enhances learners' linguistic abilities but also fosters autonomy and confidence in language use. The article concludes by offering practical recommendations for educators to integrate scaffolding strategies into second language instruction, ensuring a more supportive and adaptive learning environment.

References

1. Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. “Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research”, 33-56.

2. Ellis, R. (2003). “Task-based language learning and teaching.” Oxford University Press.

3. Gibbons, P. (2015). “Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching English language learners in the mainstream classroom.” Heinemann.

4. Lantolf, J., & Thorne, S. (2006). “Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development.” Oxford University Press.

5. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate. “Applied Linguistics, 16”(3), 371-391.

6. Mustafoyeva, M. A. (2024). THE STUDY AND IMPORTANCE OF ANTHROPONYMS IN LINGUISTICS. Bulletin news in New Science Society International Scientific Journal, 1(5), 20-23.

7. Mustafoyeva, M. A. (2024). ANTHROPONYMS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES AND THEIR LINGUOCULTURAL CLASSIFICATION. Bulletin news in New Science Society International Scientific Journal, 1(6), 146-150.

8. Mustafoeva, M. A. (2024). The Significance of Proper and Common Nouns in Linguistics. European journal of innovation in nonformal education (EJINE), 4(10).

9. Mustafoeva, M. A. (2022). The lexical layers of Uzbek anthroponyms. Fars international journal of education, social sciences and humanities, 10(12), 2022-6.

10. Mustafoeva, M. A. (2024). The importance of nouns in linguistics for learning language. European journal of innovation in nonformal education (EJINE), 4(9).

11. Mustafoeva, M. A. (2022). Ingliz tilidagi antroponimlarning rivojlanishining tarixiy taraqqiyot davri va leksik qatlami. Namangan Davlat Universiteti Ilmiy Axborotnomasi, 12, 2181-0427.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-17