KIMYO O‘QUV DASTURLARINI TAKOMILLASHTIRISH: KONTEKSTUAL YONDASHUVDAN ELEKTRON TA’LIMGACHA
Keywords:
Kimyo ta’limi, zamonaviy yondashuvlar, moslashuvchan ta’lim, interaktivlik, elektron ta’lim, kontekstga asoslangan ta’lim, COVID-19 va ta’lim, texnologiyaning integratsiyasi, nazariy va amaliy bilimlar, moslashtirilgan baholash tizimlari.Abstract
Maqolada kimyo ta’limida zamonaviy yondashuvlarning roli va ahamiyati chuqur tahlil qilinadi. Moslashuvchanlik, interaktivlik va texnologiyadan foydalanishning ta’lim samaradorligiga ta’siri ko‘rib chiqilib, kontekstga asoslangan ta’lim, moslashtirilgan baholash tizimlari, aralash va elektron ta’lim modellarining amaliy natijalari o‘rganilgan. COVID-19 pandemiyasi sharoitida kimyo ta’limini moslashtirish bo‘yicha o‘tkazilgan tadqiqotlar ushbu jarayonning muvaffaqiyatli usullarini aniqlashga imkon bergan.Tadqiqotlar natijalari shuni ko‘rsatadiki, moslashuvchan yondashuvlar o’quvchilarning ehtiyojlariga moslashgan holda samarali ta’lim muhitini yaratishda muhim omil hisoblanadi. Shuningdek, texnologiyaning ta’limga integratsiyasi va nazariy bilimlarni amaliyot bilan bog‘lash o‘quv jarayonining sifatini oshirishga xizmat qiladi. Ushbu maqola kimyo ta’limini innovatsion uslublar asosida rivojlantirish va o’quvchilar uchun samarali o‘quv muhitini shakllantirishga qaratilgan muhim xulosalar va tavsiyalarni taqdim etadi.
References
1. Bennett, J., and Lubben, F. "Context‐based Chemistry: The Salters Approach." International Journal of Science Education 28, no. 9 (2006): 999–1015. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702496.
2. Balasubramanian, B., and DeSantis, C. "Assessment à la Mode: Implementing Adaptable Exams in Virtual Learning." Journal of Chemical Education 97, no. 9 (2020): 2643–2648. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00767.
3. Seery, M. K., and O'Connor, C. "E‐Learning and Blended Learning in Chemistry Education." In Teaching Chemistry: A Studybook, edited by I. Devetak and S. A. Glažar, 527–550. Berlin: Springer, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527679300.ch26.
4. Taber, K. S., and De Jong, O. "Teaching and Learning the Many Faces of Chemistry." In Second International Handbook of Science Education, edited by B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, and C. J. McRobbie, 285–300. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2150-0_17.
5. Rodríguez-Rodríguez, E. "Analytical Chemistry Teaching Adaptation in the COVID-19 Period." Journal of Chemical Education 97, no. 9 (2020): 2599–2604. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00923.
6. Scanlon, E., and Legron-Rodriguez, T. "Postsecondary Chemistry Curricula and Universal Design for Learning: Planning for Variations in Learners' Abilities, Needs, and Interests." Chemistry Education Research and Practice 19, no. 4 (2018): 985–995. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8rp00095f.
7. Reyes, C. T., Lawrie, G. A., and Thompson, C. D. "Analysis of Online First-Year Chemistry Resources Using the Universal Design for Learning Framework." Chemistry Education Research and Practice 23, no. 2 (2022): 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1rp00171j.
8. Van Driel, J. H., Bulte, A. M. W., and Verloop, N. "Using the Curriculum Emphasis Concept to Investigate Teachers' Curricular Beliefs in Educational Reform." Journal of Curriculum Studies 40, no. 1 (2008): 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270601078259.
9. Raker, J. R., Reisner, B. A., and Smith, S. R. "In-Depth Coursework in Undergraduate Inorganic Chemistry: A National Survey." Journal of Chemical Education 92, no. 6 (2015): 993–1002. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500625f.
10. Elmas, R., Rusek, M., Lindell, A., and Nieminen, P. "The Intellectual Demands of the Intended Chemistry Curriculum in Czechia, Finland, and Turkey." Chemistry Education Research and Practice 21, no. 1 (2020): 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0rp00058b.
